![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
|
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: Fiction: Without the proposed Sunrise Powerlink, there will be a serious ‘power gap’. FACT: Improved local energy conservation and increased efficiency in San Diego would eliminate the energy reliability gap cited by SDG&E to justify the Powerlink. Simple measures like installing efficient air conditioning systems and replacing incandescent bulbs by 2012 could significantly reduce peak energy demand.(1) In addition, SDG&E has already proposed the addition of 250 MW of “peaking” turbines by 2008.(2) This step alone would eliminate much of the emergency “power gap” calculated by SDG&E to justify the Sunrise Powerlink. Furthermore, simple upgrades to existing energy infrastructure can further boost San Diego’s energy supply and eliminate the need for the Powerlink. Furthermore, according to The Division of Ratepayer Advocates, an agency within the California Public Utilities Commission that reviews utility projects on consumers' behalf, enough steps already have been taken to plug a forecasted shortfall for 2010 without the Sunrise Powerlink.(3) This assertion is underscored by findings of the Utility Consumers’ Action Network (UCAN).(4) Finally, the energy “crisis” of the early days of the 21st Century has now been shown to have resulted from market manipulation by the likes of Enron and SDG&E’s parent company, Sempra Energy.(5) This was, and is, a manufactured shortage that can be readily avoided. Fiction: The proposed Sunrise Powerlink is needed to transport renewable energy into San Diego County. FACT: Renewable energy goals can be met by existing transmission lines, as conceded under oath by Jim Avery, a Senior Vice President of SDG&E.(6) This fact has been underscored by several energy experts.(7) Additionally, local renewable energy resources are available in San Diego. This has been confirmed by a 2005 report partially funded by SDG&E entitled, "Potential for Renewable Energy in the San Diego Region."(8) For example, with San Diego's abundance of sunlight and the right mix of education and incentives like grants, loans and tax breaks, energy from commercial and residential rooftop solar could reasonably exceed existing demand when it is needed most on hot summer days.(9)1. Personal.com. Bill Powers, Border Power Plants Working Group. Also see Los Angeles Times, “Bill to ban sale of incandescent light bulbs advances”, April 24, 2007. 2. SDG&E Press Release, May 14, 2007, “SDG&E selects projects to meet peak-power demand in 2008,” http://sdge.com/news/news_releases.html. 3. Dave Downey, North County Times, “Power line not needed, report says,” May 21, 2007. 4. “UCAN Testimony on Overview of Technical Testimony, SDG&E Misinformation and Alternatives,” June 1, 2007. 5. California Public Utilities Commission, Order Instituting Rulemaking to Establish Policies and Rules to Ensure Reliable, Long-Term Supplies of Natural Gas to California,” January 22, 2004, http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/FINAL_DECISION/33642-01.htm. 6 Craig D. Rose, San Diego Union-Tribune, "Powerlink's supply called into question," July 11, 2007. 7 Utility Consumers' Action Network and Border
Power Plant Working Group, "Comments on Draft 2005 IEPR Transmission Chapter
- The Sunrise Powerlink and Alternatives for Moving Renewable-Generated
Electricity, Relieving Congestion, and Assuring Reliability in the Service
Territory of the San Diego Gas & Electric Company," October
14, 2005, http://www.ucan.org/energy/electricity/ucans_comments_on_the_ 8 San Diego Regional Renewable Energy Study Group, "Potential for Renewable Energy in the San Diego Region," August 2005, http://www.renewables.org. 9 Ibid.Key contacts: Send donations to the Protect
Our Communities Fund: 619-235-2300; eyoung@sdfoundation.org
|
Upcoming Events: Publication of Draft EIR/EIS Draft EIR/EIS Workshops Conducted by Environmental Review Team Telephonic Discovery Conferences Begin Again, Public Participation Hearing - Pine Valley Public Participation Hearing - Borrego Springs Public Participation Hearing - Ramona Details for the Public Participation Hearings are as follows: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2008 , 6:30 p.m.
|
||||||||